Law Profs Attack TPP’s ‘Rigged Pseudo Court’--and They Have a Point

, The Litigation Daily

   | 3 Comments

A sham. A disaster. A disgrace. That’s how opponents describe the legal process for resolving disputes under the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • David E.H. Smith

    Excerpts from RESPONSE to; ‘The Submission‘; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CHINA (C-CIT), CANADA (C-CIT, TPP, CETA), AMERICA(TPP, TTIP), EUROPE (CETA, TTIP), The TRANS PACIFIC NATIONS (TPP), et al, vs. the harmless non shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al‘. CETAgreement, TPPartnership, C-CITreaty, et al; More Taxes & Less Services to pay The SHAREHOLDERS (Tribunals). “WILL The COURT CONSIDER…?” And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians… Are YOU Depriving your Highest Court of the INFO to Decide Against the Global Corporate Economy? Has Frau Bundaskanzarin Angela Merkel (Germ.) shared the Info with YOU? by David E.H. Smith (CAN.)…Therefore, as a consequence of the aforementioned abuses that have been listed in the enclosed research articles & the dire peril that these abuses puts the NON shareholding Canadians in, both; Native & non Native, et al, as an elaborate, ”inhumane”, ”unethical”, “immoral” & probably, criminal, enterprise, the writer humbly asks; under what circumstances would The Court consider the following? 1) Will The Court consider ensuring that any further attempts by off shore enterprises, such as the aforementioned attempts by the global corporate “arrangements”, including corporate Canada & its associates within the government of Canada, et al, as a “reciprocity pool” of shared “secret decisions” against the non-shareholders of Canada, et al, will be dealt with punitively. 2) And, in the interim, until The Court can make a determination of any wrongful intent, &/or, abuses of the ”arrangements” as a criminal enterprise, will the open & public Supreme Court of Canada consider preventing the further use of the non-shareholders‘ tax dollars from being used to make any, &/or, any more secret decisions against themselves, ie. the NON shareholders. 3) Furthermore, can, or, will The Court consider ordering the return of any & all of the tax dollars that have been used by the government, &/or, corporate Canada & their lawyers, et al, that have been used for the development of the aforementioned “arrangements” of a what The Court may determine to be a criminal enterprise (for examples; a) as a means of using/legitimizing off-shore money, et al, b) laundering money from the proceeds of criminal enterprises, &/or, c) going toward the funding of “criminals”, et al, who may be involved in other criminal, or, unethical, or, inhumane, immoral enterprises), and thus, the tax dollars have not been used for the purposes that the taxpayers had intended, such as; for goods, services (particularly to police organizations & judiciaries for their investigation of, not only the aforementioned secret/privileged relationship between corporate Canada via its lobbyists and the executives of the relevant political parties, but, the alleged wrong doing by others, as well), programs, health, education, etc. that are consistent with the NON shareholders‘ understanding of what “good” government entails and return the tax dollars with punitive penalties paid to the NON shareholding Canadians, both: Native & non Native, et al. ... *** For the FULL Submission see; The Supreme Court of Canada, or, to order your copy the FULL Submission via; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

  • David E.H. Smith

    Excerpts from RESPONSE to; ‘The Submission‘; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CHINA (C-CIT), CANADA (C-CIT, TPP, CETA), AMERICA(TPP, TTIP), EUROPE (CETA, TTIP), The TRANS PACIFIC NATIONS (TPP), et al, vs. the harmless non shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al‘. CETAgreement, TPPartnership, C-CITreaty, et al; More Taxes & Less Services to pay The SHAREHOLDERS (Tribunals). “WILL The COURT CONSIDER…?” And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians… Are YOU Depriving your Highest Court of the INFO to Decide Against the Global Corporate Economy? Has Frau Bundaskanzarin Angela Merkel (Germ.) shared the Info with YOU? by David E.H. Smith (CAN.)…Therefore, as a consequence of the aforementioned abuses that have been listed in the enclosed research articles & the dire peril that these abuses puts the NON shareholding Canadians in, both; Native & non Native, et al, as an elaborate, ”inhumane”, ”unethical”, “immoral” & probably, criminal, enterprise, the writer humbly asks; under what circumstances would The Court consider the following? 1) Will The Court consider ensuring that any further attempts by off shore enterprises, such as the aforementioned attempts by the global corporate “arrangements”, including corporate Canada & its associates within the government of Canada, et al, as a “reciprocity pool” of shared “secret decisions” against the non-shareholders of Canada, et al, will be dealt with punitively. 2) And, in the interim, until The Court can make a determination of any wrongful intent, &/or, abuses of the ”arrangements” as a criminal enterprise, will the open & public Supreme Court of Canada consider preventing the further use of the non-shareholders‘ tax dollars from being used to make any, &/or, any more secret decisions against themselves, ie. the NON shareholders. 3) Furthermore, can, or, will The Court consider ordering the return of any & all of the tax dollars that have been used by the government, &/or, corporate Canada & their lawyers, et al, that have been used for the development of the aforementioned “arrangements” of a what The Court may determine to be a criminal enterprise (for examples; a) as a means of using/legitimizing off-shore money, et al, b) laundering money from the proceeds of criminal enterprises, &/or, c) going toward the funding of “criminals”, et al, who may be involved in other criminal, or, unethical, or, inhumane, immoral enterprises), and thus, the tax dollars have not been used for the purposes that the taxpayers had intended, such as; for goods, services (particularly to police organizations & judiciaries for their investigation of, not only the aforementioned secret/privileged relationship between corporate Canada via its lobbyists and the executives of the relevant political parties, but, the alleged wrong doing by others, as well), programs, health, education, etc. that are consistent with the NON shareholders‘ understanding of what “good” government entails and return the tax dollars with punitive penalties paid to the NON shareholding Canadians, both: Native & non Native, et al. ... *** For the FULL Submission see; The Supreme Court of Canada, or, to order your copy the FULL Submission via; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

  • David E.H. Smith

    Excerpts from RESPONSE to; ‘The Submission‘; The SUPREME COURT of CANADA; The SHAREHOLDERS, corporates CHINA (C-CIT), CANADA (C-CIT, TPP, CETA), AMERICA(TPP, TTIP), EUROPE (CETA, TTIP), The TRANS PACIFIC NATIONS (TPP), et al, vs. the harmless non shareholders of Canada, both; Native & non Native, et al‘. CETAgreement, TPPartnership, C-CITreaty, et al; More Taxes & Less Services to pay The SHAREHOLDERS (Tribunals). “WILL The COURT CONSIDER…?” And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous International treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians… Are YOU Depriving your Highest Court of the INFO to Decide Against the Global Corporate Economy? Has Frau Bundaskanzarin Angela Merkel (Germ.) shared the Info with YOU? by David E.H. Smith (CAN.)…Therefore, as a consequence of the aforementioned abuses that have been listed in the enclosed research articles & the dire peril that these abuses puts the NON shareholding Canadians in, both; Native & non Native, et al, as an elaborate, ”inhumane”, ”unethical”, “immoral” & probably, criminal, enterprise, the writer humbly asks; under what circumstances would The Court consider the following? 1) Will The Court consider ensuring that any further attempts by off shore enterprises, such as the aforementioned attempts by the global corporate “arrangements”, including corporate Canada & its associates within the government of Canada, et al, as a “reciprocity pool” of shared “secret decisions” against the non-shareholders of Canada, et al, will be dealt with punitively. 2) And, in the interim, until The Court can make a determination of any wrongful intent, &/or, abuses of the ”arrangements” as a criminal enterprise, will the open & public Supreme Court of Canada consider preventing the further use of the non-shareholders‘ tax dollars from being used to make any, &/or, any more secret decisions against themselves, ie. the NON shareholders. 3) Furthermore, can, or, will The Court consider ordering the return of any & all of the tax dollars that have been used by the government, &/or, corporate Canada & their lawyers, et al, that have been used for the development of the aforementioned “arrangements” of a what The Court may determine to be a criminal enterprise (for examples; a) as a means of using/legitimizing off-shore money, et al, b) laundering money from the proceeds of criminal enterprises, &/or, c) going toward the funding of “criminals”, et al, who may be involved in other criminal, or, unethical, or, inhumane, immoral enterprises), and thus, the tax dollars have not been used for the purposes that the taxpayers had intended, such as; for goods, services (particularly to police organizations & judiciaries for their investigation of, not only the aforementioned secret/privileged relationship between corporate Canada via its lobbyists and the executives of the relevant political parties, but, the alleged wrong doing by others, as well), programs, health, education, etc. that are consistent with the NON shareholders‘ understanding of what “good” government entails and return the tax dollars with punitive penalties paid to the NON shareholding Canadians, both: Native & non Native, et al. ... *** For the FULL Submission see; The Supreme Court of Canada, or, to order your copy the FULL Submission via; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202766918350

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.